Expert Insights

A Security Leader's Guide to Digital Proximity & Prioritization

Learn how to use continuous discovery and Digital Proximity™ (patent pending) to prioritize risk.

Sabrina Pagnotta

Head of Marketing

September 24, 2025

September 24, 2025

A forgotten subdomain, an unmonitored SaaS instance, a vendor’s misconfigured API... These unknown assets and supplier-linked systems don’t wait for your next quarterly scan; they create residual risk that traditional cycles miss.  

What’s missing isn’t more scanning, pen testing, or vendor risk assessments. It’s continuous visibility with context: the ability to say not just what exists but how close it is to what matters most. That’s Digital Proximity™ (Patent Pending), and it’s the difference between chasing alerts and making confident risk decisions.

The five shifts that actually change outcomes

1) Real-time external asset discovery
Move from “What did we find last quarter?” to “What changed today?” Focus on the long tail: domains, subdomains, APIs, ephemeral cloud, and SaaS sprawl.  

Outcome: fewer surprises, faster triage.  

2) Supply-chain & third-party visibility
Don’t wait for a vendor to self-report. Independently discover assets and misconfigurations that point back to you, and monitor tier-1 suppliers continuously.  

Outcome: fewer indirect blasts.  

3) Continuous attack-surface prioritization
Flat scoring systems and security rating tools treat every exposure as equal. But cyber risk doesn’t work that way. With Digital Proximity™ (Patent Pending), you can prioritize by exposure level, asset criticality, and blast radius.  

Outcome: a measure of how close each risk is to sensitive systems, with faster time-to-risk-decision.

4) Integration with governance & response
Risk data doesn’t help if it sits in PDFs. Push findings into SIEM, SOAR, or GRC systems, auto-generate tickets, and route them straight to owners.  

Outcome: faster alert-to-fix cycles without adding new consoles.  

5) Regulatory & audit support
Regulators and boards don’t want more jargon. They want evidence: exposure trendlines, inventory snapshots, remediation timelines, defensible logs. Continuous oversight makes compliance less scramble, more byproduct.

Outcome: smoother board readouts and regulator interactions.  

What to show the board (and why they’ll care)

Map risk in digital proximity terms: not just “what exists,” but how close each exposure sits to crown-jewel data and critical processes. Pair this with a short scorecard including:

  • % of inventory updated on schedule
  • Ratio of known-to-unknown assets
  • Vendor coverage across tier-1 partners
  • Median time-to-risk-decision
  • Mean time to remediation for high-exposure assets

These are metrics regulators already expect to see, and they’re numbers that tell a story executives can actually understand.

30-60-90: The pragmatic path (no rip-and-replace)

  • Day 0–30: Start agentless from your primary domains; baseline assets and quick-win exposures. (A light-touch, domain-only kickoff lowers friction.)  
  • Day 31–60: Add tier-1 vendors; push enriched alerts into SIEM/SOAR; hold weekly exposure reviews.  
  • Day 61–90: Establish executive scorecards and audit trails; shift to continuous prioritization tied to business criticality.  

This is a phased, pragmatic way to move from static snapshots to living visibility. You don’t need “complete” discovery (nobody has it); you need continuous discovery with context.

Share on Linkedin
Follow us on LinkedIn to get the latest insights.
get a personalized demo
What’s connected to you right now?
Thank you! You are now susbribed to The Recon Log
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
ALL THINGS
CYBER
A ThingsRecon podcast
Real exposure.
Real stories.
Share on LinkedinShare on XShare on Facebook