Expert Insights

A Security Leader's Guide to Digital Proximity & Prioritization

Learn how to use continuous discovery and Digital Proximity™ (patent pending) to prioritize risk.

Sabrina Pagnotta

Head of Marketing

September 24, 2025

September 24, 2025

A forgotten subdomain, an unmonitored SaaS instance, a vendor’s misconfigured API... These unknown assets and supplier-linked systems don’t wait for your next quarterly scan; they create residual risk that traditional cycles miss.  

What’s missing isn’t more scanning, pen testing, or vendor risk assessments. It’s continuous visibility with context: the ability to say not just what exists but how close it is to what matters most. That’s Digital Proximity™ (Patent Pending), and it’s the difference between chasing alerts and making confident risk decisions.

The five shifts that actually change outcomes

1) Real-time external asset discovery
Move from “What did we find last quarter?” to “What changed today?” Focus on the long tail: domains, subdomains, APIs, ephemeral cloud, and SaaS sprawl.  

Outcome: fewer surprises, faster triage.  

2) Supply-chain & third-party visibility
Don’t wait for a vendor to self-report. Independently discover assets and misconfigurations that point back to you, and monitor tier-1 suppliers continuously.  

Outcome: fewer indirect blasts.  

3) Continuous attack-surface prioritization
Flat scoring systems and security rating tools treat every exposure as equal. But cyber risk doesn’t work that way. With Digital Proximity™ (Patent Pending), you can prioritize by exposure level, asset criticality, and blast radius.  

Outcome: a measure of how close each risk is to sensitive systems, with faster time-to-risk-decision.

4) Integration with governance & response
Risk data doesn’t help if it sits in PDFs. Push findings into SIEM, SOAR, or GRC systems, auto-generate tickets, and route them straight to owners.  

Outcome: faster alert-to-fix cycles without adding new consoles.  

5) Regulatory & audit support
Regulators and boards don’t want more jargon. They want evidence: exposure trendlines, inventory snapshots, remediation timelines, defensible logs. Continuous oversight makes compliance less scramble, more byproduct.

Outcome: smoother board readouts and regulator interactions.  

What to show the board (and why they’ll care)

Map risk in digital proximity terms: not just “what exists,” but how close each exposure sits to crown-jewel data and critical processes. Pair this with a short scorecard including:

  • % of inventory updated on schedule
  • Ratio of known-to-unknown assets
  • Vendor coverage across tier-1 partners
  • Median time-to-risk-decision
  • Mean time to remediation for high-exposure assets

These are metrics regulators already expect to see, and they’re numbers that tell a story executives can actually understand.

30-60-90: The pragmatic path (no rip-and-replace)

  • Day 0–30: Start agentless from your primary domains; baseline assets and quick-win exposures. (A light-touch, domain-only kickoff lowers friction.)  
  • Day 31–60: Add tier-1 vendors; push enriched alerts into SIEM/SOAR; hold weekly exposure reviews.  
  • Day 61–90: Establish executive scorecards and audit trails; shift to continuous prioritization tied to business criticality.  

This is a phased, pragmatic way to move from static snapshots to living visibility. You don’t need “complete” discovery (nobody has it); you need continuous discovery with context.

get a personalized demo
What’s connected to you right now?
Thank you! You are now susbribed to The Recon Log
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Share on LinkedinShare on XShare on Facebook